
|
|
The Next Generation Enterprise - What is it?
by Brian Magierski on 2007-10-10 04:04 PM read 5872 times Source: http://brian.magierski.com/2007/10/10/the-next-generation... |
|
In my last post, Defining the Next Generation Enterprise (NGE) - All Hands on Deck!, I kicked off an effort to begin an open, collaborative dialog in the Web 2.0 world on defining an NGE and providing a roadmap for NGE transformation. This post, Next Generation Enterprise - The What and Why - is the first in this promised series of blog posts, and will focus on the topic of providing a simple definition of what an NGE is, and a set of compelling reasons why the shift to NGE is necessary.
First, here are a couple of ground rules, disclaimers, and credits for this overall series of posts on NGE:
Good enough … what follows for the remainder of this post is a proposed definition of an NGE and our point of view on the reasons why NGE transformation is necessary now. I’ll try to be short to encourage comments, participation and debate.
First, here is some pre-work if you have not done it already. Bob Morrison from our BSG Concours division authored an excellent Boardroom Imperative on NGEs to kick-off our NGE transformation efforts. This Boardroom Imperative is a must-read for this series of posts, which I hope will build upon Bob’s work.
Let’s start with a definition of an NGE. We have not yet formally codified a definition of an NGE internally at BSG Alliance. Here is an initial shot below; this may be a moving target, but we’ll try to form a definition that can stand the test of time, even as fast as time moves in the NGE world.
A Next Generation Enterprise is an agile organization that operates a highly collaborative, open, network-based business model with fully engaged constituencies, and executes with high-velocity, On Demand, in delivering world-class experiences and desired outcomes for its customers and constituents.
Note the key descriptors in the definition. Our point of view is that you cannot be NGE without each being a characteristic of your enterprise:
Many of these characteristics are nearly direct opposites of a traditionally organized business over the last half-century or so! Companies are typically thought of as:
Why is such an extreme re-architecting of the traditional hierarchical organization with the buyer/supplier execution model required? Our belief is we are at the cusp of a series of fundamental shifts in the global economy which necessitate the transformation to NGE for competitive advantage and most likely enterprise survival. Some industries are seeing this change now and others will not see it for some time, but we do believe this is a 20 year transformational shift and a major disruption in global business. From a Schumpeter-based point of view, we will be undergoing massive creative destruction, which in the end will be a significant benefit to the global economy and those companies that embrace NGE transformation will not only survive, but thrive.
In my next post, I will explore these fundamental shifts in the global economy which are driving the need for NGE transformation.
^ brian
[…] left off on my last post, The Next Generation Enterprise - What is it?” indicating that we’re on the cusp of a major transformational shift in business which will […]
One of the most interesting, to me, parts of your definition of an NGE is this: “engaged constituencies.”
Too many people might not understand what you mean by “constituencies.” Beyond customers, which may be considered the most integral constituents for a corporation, we also have other constituents to consider.
Probably most important are employees. NGEs engage their employees in such a way that the employees truly understand that their contributions directly affect the corporation’s ability to remain competitive. The more engaged the employee base is with the company vision, the higher the performance of the employees, and, ultimately, the more agile the organization becomes.
Next, a company must understand that there are a group of interested individuals, who are neither customers nor employees, who have some bearing on the company’s vision. These are “community members” who are interested in the company’s products, services, or expertise. These are the types of people who might join a user group, for example. They have an interest in what the company does, and they will have input on the company’s vision. They may be potential customers or employees of the company in the future. NGEs understand that the input from interested, but somewhat unconnected, parties is still valuable to their overall organizational flexibility.
Finally, one often overlooked NGE constituent group is employment candidates. These people are important to an NGE because they offer the potential to grow an organization. The more high-quality talent a company can secure, the better able the company is to compete on a global scale. NGEs recognize the importance of these “talent communities” to their ability to remain flexible and agile.
Any other additions to the “constituencies” section?
-Katie
Hi,
I really like the definition. I represent a social computing consulting firm and being bold, I would add something along the lines of internal branding itno your definition. Internal branding should be what distinguishes a company from its competitors - I am taking about an enterprise wide internal branding leadership approach, and not a solely HR focus. As brands in the future will be created with/by/through any stakeholder, inside or outside the boarders of an enterprise, I see the internal branding as the thing that glues the company together. What is your point of view on this?
Magdalena, Helsinki
SOA and On Demand apps adoption are both required…
Tony,Nice post. I couldn’t agree more. Having legacy and enterprise applications wrapped in a SOA architecture and accessible via Web Services is a must for Next Generation Enterprises. All of the On Demand apps and collaboration in the world will be …