More Options
Subscribe
nGenera Community Feed
Done Customizing
Home
Overview
Meetings
Overview
Interest Groups
Overview
People
Overview
Ideas
Overview
Documents
Overview
Bookmarks
Community
News
Events
Blogs
Home
Industry
Support
Bookmark items via the
icon
Search:
Overview
Welcome,
Log In
or
Sign Up
Actions:
Start a Conversation
Submit an Idea
Upload a Document
Enter a Task
Create a Survey
Poll the Hub
Create an Interest Group
Create a Meeting
Create an Idea Campaign
+ More Actions
View User Content
View Profile
« The biggest media meltdown since "Dewey Defeats Truman."
|
Home
|
I Found Agile Talent in a Suitcase »
Telelogic Focal Point Info
belongs to
nGenera Product Management
by
Anonymous User
on 2008-01-11 09:51 PM read 121 times
Focal_Point_Solution_-_Slides_20070218.ppt
FP feature comparison.xls
Focal Point Screen Shots.docx
Tags:
Jeff Milne
,
nGenera Product Management
,
nGeneraLock
,
requirementsmanagement
,
Teleogic
Published on 2008-01-14 04:19 PM
Brittain
A few quick Teleogic thoughts
a reply to
Telelogic Focal Point Info
Found their breadth welcome. Managing the upfront PM process is probably as worthwhile to us as the task management.
Worried about integration with other systems.
Didn't like the UI (popup dialogs?!?)
Liked the load-balancing and prioritization features
Definitely would need to see more before moving forward.
Published on 2008-01-14 05:55 PM
Anonymous User
Strengths / Weaknesses
a reply to
Telelogic Focal Point Info
Strengths
Good company quals – large, profitable, viable
Web-based, can be purchased as SaaS or license
Good scalability quals (50,000+ users - Nokia)
Great tracking and organization of features
Supports traceability between related artifacts (feature to requirement, design spec, etc.)
Flexible / dynamic / visual feature scoring – benefits vs. risks
Supports what-if release analysis – benefit coverage, cost, scope, capacity, customer request coverage, etc.
Supports full life cycle of feature management
Flexible grouping of features across many dimensions – release, product, etc. – not hierarchical
Multi-user editing of a feature – locks at field level.
Good filtering and reporting
Open architecture through SOAP services
MS Project integration
Has workflow, notification, and status tracking – support for SAS 70 audits
Weaknesses
Auditing must be set at attribute level – could be cumbersome to set up
Feature data entry may be cumbersome since must be entered individually – although allows upload of data from spreadsheet.
No document versioning – weak CMS capabilities
No auditing of document changes – SAS 70 auditing deficiency
No tagging capabilities – could simulate some of this capability through other mechanisms.
Definitely would need to see more before moving forward.
No current tags