

Way back in 1982, futurist John Naisbitt authored the fascinating book Megatrends. I especially recall my reaction to one of the trends – High tech, high touch – and the need to balance between technology and human interaction. I recently caught a small segment on television about the making of Avatar. (There’s lots of interesting clips of this stuff on YouTube.) A couple of things really struck me.
The breadth and depth of new technologies invented (or, in come cases, refined) by James Cameron and his team is truly astounding. Not just the “performance capture” technologies and related techniques, but also the technology to integrate the video streams from dozens (in some cases, hundreds) of video cameras and computer generated graphics in real time to a single ‘virtual camera‘ device that Cameron could look through as the filming was being done, and let him select the best angles and perspectives to capture the moment. According to Wikipedia, the virtual camera system:
…displays an augmented reality on a monitor, placing the actor’s virtual counterparts into their digital surroundings in real time, allowing the director to adjust and direct scenes just as if shooting live action. According to Cameron, “It’s like a big, powerful game engine. If I want to fly through space, or change my perspective, I can. I can turn the whole scene into a living miniature and go through it on a 50 to 1 scale.”
Other technical innovations included a system for lighting very large areas, a massive motion-capture stage and the technology and methods for full performance capture, including facial expressions. He also reduced the weight of notoriously heavy and unwieldy 3-D cameras to something that could just about be hand-held and up to the dynamics he envisioned for Avata.
But what most intrigued me, and took me back to Naisbitt and Megatrends, was the attention Cameron paid to the “hi touch” to make such a hi tech movie work. This included taking the actors to rain forests in Hawaii to spend time getting the feel of such a landscape – and some of the most similar terrain he could find to his imaginary Pandora. He wanted the actors to hike around the forest – to be able to recapture the feeling of a lush forest when they were on the concrete sound stage. He wanted the actors to really look as though they were in control of the flying creatures, so he build a gimbal rig to let the actors get the feel of the movements (which had been previously worked out with wire frame models and their possible flight paths).
How are you balancing the high technology you are deploying with the high touch techniques that will help them integrate into the human world in which they must operate?
Image Courtesy of Collider.com
imgimgThe breadth and depth of new technologies invented (or, in come cases, refined) by James Cameron and his team is truly astounding. Not just the “performance capture” technologies and related techniques, but also the technology to integrate the video streams from dozens (in some cases, hundreds) of video cameras and computer generated graphics in real time to a single ‘virtual camera‘ device that Cameron could look through as the filming was being done, and let him select the best angles and perspectives to capture the moment. According to Wikipedia, the virtual camera system:
…displays an augmented reality on a monitor, placing the actor’s virtual counterparts into their digital surroundings in real time, allowing the director to adjust and direct scenes just as if shooting live action. According to Cameron, “It’s like a big, powerful game engine. If I want to fly through space, or change my perspective, I can. I can turn the whole scene into a living miniature and go through it on a 50 to 1 scale.”
Other technical innovations included a system for lighting very large areas, a massive motion-capture stage and the technology and methods for full performance capture, including facial expressions. He also reduced the weight of notoriously heavy and unwieldy 3-D cameras to something that could just about be hand-held and up to the dynamics he envisioned for Avata.
But what most intrigued me, and took me back to Naisbitt and Megatrends, was the attention Cameron paid to the “hi touch” to make such a hi tech movie work. This included taking the actors to rain forests in Hawaii to spend time getting the feel of such a landscape – and some of the most similar terrain he could find to his imaginary Pandora. He wanted the actors to hike around the forest – to be able to recapture the feeling of a lush forest when they were on the concrete sound stage. He wanted the actors to really look as though they were in control of the flying creatures, so he build a gimbal rig to let the actors get the feel of the movements (which had been previously worked out with wire frame models and their possible flight paths).
How are you balancing the high technology you are deploying with the high touch techniques that will help them integrate into the human world in which they must operate?
Image Courtesy of Collider.com
imgimg
|
Marketing on the cheap thanks to spontaneous (mainstream) internet culture
by Jeff DeChambeau on 2010-02-08 02:26 AM read 357 times |
|
Viral marketing seems like something of the holy grail for advertisers: it’s very cheap, turns peers into pushers, and is impossible to stop once it attains gains enough inertia. But designing a message to go viral is difficult, and if marketers have found the secret sauce they’re keeping it very tightly guarded. Yet, despite all the time and energy that goes into even reasonably successful viral campaigns, their popularity often seems meek compared to things that just happen. There’s a whole world of “internet memes” out there, little bits of digital culture that catch like wildfire in people’s attention and spread around the internet; these are what the best viral marketing campaigns can only hope to be.
Some time ago internet memes were confined mostly to the periphery of the Internet, but some made it into the mainstream–think LOLCats and RickRolling. These two and their fore-bearers originally spread on message boards, forums, and irc channels; parts of the internet that weren’t especially welcoming to casual users. But the face of the internet has changed, it’s friendlier and more people are on it. And it’s more social. Lots has been written about how it’s easier for messages to go viral on social networking sites like facebook because people have a built-in friends list, and their peers are likely to be more receptive to a message that comes from a friend.
Lately on facebook, though, these mainstream internet memes really seem to be taking off. A few weeks ago women everywhere were posting status updates that were only on word long: a color that corresponded to their bra. This was allegedly to raise awareness about breast cancer, though it’s equally plausible that the idea was to “confuse boys.” Shortly thereafter, “doppelganger week” began, and people started changing their facebook pictures to photos of celebrities that they vaguely (or wishfully) resembled. Next was the “post the urbandictionary definition of your name. Finally, and most recently, has been a political meme going around seeing if an onion ring can collect more facebook fans than Canada’s prime minister, Stephen Harper (and boy can it ever).
These four memes have taken over my facebook newsfeed, and likely those of just about everyone else who shares more than a few friends with me. Viral marketers would love to get this kind of reach, but doing so largely remains a dream. So why not change the rules of the game a bit?
Urbandictionary is clearly benefiting a great deal from being the center of attention in this way, but what’s to stop other companies from joining-in on the trend and showing that they “get it.” Various breast cancer societies could have easily hopped on the bra-color bandwagon. New York Fries or Pizza Pizza (the only places I can think of off the top of my head that serve onion rings) could roll out a “Prime Minister Onion Meal,” and any number of celebrity gossip magazines could use the doppelganger meme to great effect.
After all, if these trends simply “happen,” then there’s no intellectual property concerns to worry about, the message already exists and is popular (making it a proven commodity), and it shows people who already feel like they’re a part of something that the marketer/company is also in the know. Macy’s tried this by hiring Rick Astley to sing “Never gonna give you up” in 2008’s Macy’s day parade, but I think the best has yet to come in terms of marketers latching on to, and reflecting back, the spontaneous culture of the internet.
1 Reply
|
Login to Reply
| Options
Trackback URL: http://community.ngenera.com/trackback/18073-marketing-on-the-cheap-thanks-to-spontaneous-mainstream-internet-culture



[...] Marketing on the cheap thanks to spontaneous (mainstream) internet culture Published: February 7, 2010 Source: Wikinomics Viral marketing seems like something of the holy grail for advertisers: it’s very cheap, turns peers into pushers, and is impossible to stop once it attains gains enough inertia. But designing a message to go… [...]